This Article Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF) All Versions of this Article: 0013164407310133v1 68/4/571    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Woods, C. M. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

IRT-LR-DIF With Estimation of the Focal-Group Density as an Empirical Histogram

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: cwoods{at}artsci.wustl.edu.

	Abstract

Item response theory–likelihood ratio–differential item functioning (IRT-LR-DIF) is used to evaluate the degree to which items on a test or questionnaire have different measurement properties for one group of people versus another, irrespective of group-mean differences on the construct. Usually, the latent distribution is presumed normal for both groups, but previous research shows that results are biased if the true distribution is not approximately normal. This article introduces a variation of IRT-LR-DIF, called empirical histogram–differential item functioning (EH-DIF), in which the focal-group latent density is estimated simultaneously with the item parameters as an empirical histogram (EH). A simulation study shows that if the focal-group density is nonnormal, Type I error rates and focal-group estimates of the item parameters, mean, and SD are more accurate using EH-DIF than standard IRT-LR-DIF methods that presume normality. A pseudoempirical example is analyzed to illustrate EH-DIF.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?