Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information on Research and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 3e

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Educational and Psychological Measurement
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Montanelli, R. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Goodness of Fit of the Maximum-Likelihood Estimation Procedure in Factor Analysis

Richard G. Montanelli, JR

Department of Computer Science University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign

Several goodness of fit measures for factor analysis were applied to the results of maximum-likelihood factor analyses of data with known factors. Results showed that p was a fairly good measure of the degree to which the factor analytic model held in the population, although some values were large for smaller sample sizes. Two measures, c and r, were used to compare the obtained sample factors with the population factors. These measures could be used in confirmatory studies, when an hypothesized factor matrix could be written down. They showed that fairly good agreement with an hypothesis can be obtained, even when the factor analytic model does not exactly hold in the population. This would require that the investigator have a large sample size, variables with high communalities, and a low ratio of number of factors to number of variables.

Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 34, No. 3, 547-562 (1974)
DOI: 10.1177/001316447403400308


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
R. G. Montanelli JR
A Computer Program to Generate Sample Correlation and Covariance Matrices
Educational and Psychological Measurement, April 1, 1975; 35(1): 195 - 197.
[Abstract]