Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Educational and Psychological Measurement
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Page, E. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

"Top-Down" Trees of Educational Values

Ellis B. Page

University of Connecticut

The connection between highest purpose and lowest objective may be visualized as a multi-level hierarchy or tree. Most measurement work emphasizes the actual test item or behavioral objective, but such a "bottom-up" approach is here criticized as uncontrollable. A more feasible "top-down" approach begins with the definition of highest value, here called bentee (for benefit T-score). This measure is a normalized and weighted sum of a profile of test scores. The weighting may be done at each node of the tree for the branches below, by judges selected for authority or expertise. It may be done for a total society, or for specific groups, occupations, or individuals. Such a tree has mathematical properties similar to those for a tree of independent probabilities.

Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 34, No. 3, 573-584 (1974)
DOI: 10.1177/001316447403400310


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Special EducationHome page
E. B. Page
Tests and Decisions for the Handicapped: a Guide to Evaluation Under the New Laws
Journal of Special Education, December 1, 1980; 14(4): 423 - 483.
[PDF]


Home page
Am Educ Res JHome page
E. B. Page, D. Jarjoura, and C. D. Konopka
Curriculum Design Through Operations Research
American Educational Research Journal, January 1, 1976; 13(1): 31 - 49.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am Educ Res JHome page
R. Hardy
A Limitation of the Applicability of Interval Shift Analysis to Program Evaluation
American Educational Research Journal, January 1, 1975; 12(4): 544 - 549.
[PDF]