Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information on Research and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 3e

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Educational and Psychological Measurement
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Match, J.
Right arrow Articles by Wiggins, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Individual Viewpoints of Social Desirability Related to Faking Good and Desirability Estimation

Joel Match

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Nancy Wiggins

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Two groups of subjects were asked to fake good on selected MMPI scales, and to estimate the social desirability of 100 trait adjectives. These two tasks were counterbalanced for order. A control group was administered the same MMPI scales under self-report instructions and instructed to judge the social desirability of the 100 trait adjectives. The first two groups of subjects were also given 17 trait adjectives in pair-comparison format and asked to judge the difference in social desirability for each trait-pair. A multidimensional scaling analysis of the subjects' group average difference judgments among the trait words indicated three dimensions, labeled General Social Desirability, Dominance-Submission, and Excitability-Control. Individual differences were uncovered in the weights which individual subjects gave to these three dimensions. These weights were found to be related to MMPI scales showing specifiable change under faking instructions, and to the accuracy of social desirability estimation.

Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 34, No. 3, 591-606 (1974)
DOI: 10.1177/001316447403400312
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
C. Viswesvaran and D. S. Ones
Meta-Analyses of Fakability Estimates: Implications for Personality Measurement
Educational and Psychological Measurement, April 1, 1999; 59(2): 197 - 210.
[Abstract] [PDF]