Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information on Research and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 3e

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Educational and Psychological Measurement
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Neill, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Jackson, D. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Minimum Redundancy Item Analysis

John A. Neill

University of Guelph

Douglas N. Jackson

University of Western Ontario

The problem of constructing tests showing high levels of reliability and minimum mutual redundancy is considered in terms of item analysis and optimization. Certain item indices designed to optimize homogeneity while reducing redundancy are evaluated and compared. An analysis was undertaken with the aim of reducing 40-item to 20-item scales with optimal levels of the desired properties of mutual independence and homogeneity. Twenty sets of parameters yielded different levels of redundancy, evaluated in terms of the size of the first principal component, the number of 'large' components, and Gini's coefficient of concentration. It was found that item selection procedures can markedly reduce inter-scale redundancy while maintaining optimal levels of homogeneity.

Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 36, No. 1, 123-134 (1976)
DOI: 10.1177/001316447603600111


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Career AssessmentHome page
I. Gati, S. H. Osipow, and N. Fassa
The Scale Structure of Multi-Scale Measures: Application of the Split-Scale Method to the Task- Specific Occupational Self-Efficacy Scale and the Career Decision-Making Self-Efficacy Scale
Journal of Career Assessment, September 1, 1994; 2(4): 384 - 397.
[Abstract]


Home page
Applied Psychological MeasurementHome page
J. R. Reddon, R. Marceau, and D. N. Jackson
An Application of Singular Value Decomposition to the Factor Analysis of MMPI Items
Applied Psychological Measurement, June 1, 1982; 6(3): 275 - 283.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Applied Psychological MeasurementHome page
E. Helmes and D. N. Jackson
The Item Factor Structure of the Personality Research Form
Applied Psychological Measurement, March 1, 1977; 1(2): 185 - 194.
[Abstract]