Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Educational and Psychological Measurement
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gullickson, A.
Right arrow Articles by Hopkins, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Interval Estimation of Correlation Coefficients Corrected for Restriction of Range

Arlen Gullickson

University of South Dakota

Kenneth Hopkins

University of Colorado

Two objectives guided the present study: (1) to provide a suitable test for the hypothesis rho = 0, and (2) to establish nomograms by which general users of R can set confidence intervals on rho. The first objective was approached by testing several possible solutions similar to the procedure followed by Forsyth. The second objective was pursued via a combination of a general analytical procedure (Mood and Graybill, 1963) together with computer simulation techniques and a curve fitting technique (Usow, 1970). Procedures for achieving both objectives required the use of R distributions. The method used to obtain the necessary r distributions and the two procedures and their results are described.

Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 36, No. 1, 9-25 (1976)
DOI: 10.1177/001316447603600102
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Applied Psychological MeasurementHome page
N. S. Raju and P. A. Brand
Determining the Significance of Correlations Corrected for Unreliability and Range Restriction
Applied Psychological Measurement, January 1, 2003; 27(1): 52 - 71.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Applied Psychological MeasurementHome page
D. W. Zimmerman and R. H. Williams
Restriction of Range and Correlation in Outlier-Prone Distributions
Applied Psychological Measurement, September 1, 2000; 24(3): 267 - 280.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
B. Duan and W. P. Dunlap
The Accuracy of Different Methods for Estimating the Standard Error of Correlations Corrected for Range Restriction
Educational and Psychological Measurement, April 1, 1997; 57(2): 254 - 265.
[Abstract]

Home page
 Applied Psychological MeasurementHome page
N. L. Allen and S. B. Dunbar
Standard Errors of Correlations Adjusted for Incidental Selection
Applied Psychological Measurement, March 1, 1990; 14(1): 83 - 94.
[Abstract]

Home page
 Applied Psychological MeasurementHome page
R. A. Alexander, K. P. Carson, G. M. Alliger, and G. V. Barrett
Correction for Restriction of Range when Both X and Y are Truncated
Applied Psychological Measurement, April 1, 1984; 8(2): 231 - 241.
[Abstract]

Home page
 Applied Psychological MeasurementHome page
P. Bobko and A. Rieck
Large Sample Estimators for Standard Errors of Functions of Correlation Coefficients
Applied Psychological Measurement, July 1, 1980; 4(3): 385 - 398.
[Abstract]