Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information on Research and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 3e

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Educational and Psychological Measurement
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Williams, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Best, D. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Sex Stereotypes and Trait Favorability on the Adjective Check List

John E. Williams

Wake Forest University

Deborah L. Best

Wake Forest University

Using the items from the Adjective Check List in a relative judgment method. Williams and Bennett (1975) found that men and women subjects were in close agreement as to the characteristics which compose the male and female sex stereotypes. The present study was designed to replicate the Williams and Bennett findings using an absolute judgment method and also to investigate the favorability of each stereotype more systematically. Results indicated that the stereotypes derived by the two methods were highly similar and that the male and female stereotypes did not differ in overall favorability ratings. Based on the data from both studies, a single sex stereotype index score was derived for each of the 300 Adjective Check List items. These scores may be used to determine the mean sex stereotype value of standard self-descriptions, as well as any other concepts (e.g., "men in general," "ideal physician," "ideal mate") described by the use of this item pool.

Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 37, No. 1, 101-110 (1977)
DOI: 10.1177/001316447703700111


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
S. Coats and E. R. Smith
Perceptions of Gender Subtypes: Sensitivity to Recent Exemplar Activation and In-Group/Out-Group Differences
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, April 1, 1999; 25(4): 516 - 526.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
J. E. Willams, M. L. Munick, J. L. Saiz, and D. L. FormyDuval
Psychological Importance of the "Big Five": Impression Formation and Context Effects
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, August 1, 1995; 21(8): 818 - 826.
[Abstract]


Home page
Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
C. A. Speth and B. S. Plake
Assessment of Positive Sex-Role Characteristics
Educational and Psychological Measurement, June 1, 1986; 46(2): 443 - 447.
[Abstract]


Home page
Journal of Cross-Cultural PsychologyHome page
J. E. Williams, D. L. Best, C. Tilquin, H. Keller, H.-G. Voss, T. Bjerke, and B. Baarda
Traits Associated with Men and Women: Attribution by Young Children in France, Germany, Norway, the Netherlands, and Italy
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, September 1, 1981; 12(3): 327 - 346.
[Abstract]