Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information on Research and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 3e

Click here for more information on Research and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 3e

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Educational and Psychological Measurement
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lovett, H. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Criterion-Referenced Reliability Estimated by Anova

Hubert T. Lovett

Mississippi State University

For criterion-referenced (C-R) tests, variance was defined as a measure of the variability of scores from the criterion of minimal, acceptable performance. By analogy to norm-referenced test theory C-R reliability was defined as the proportion of observed variance attributable to true variance. The definition of C-R reliability was then extended to the mean of a number of parallel measures. A typical test situation was described as a randomized, complete block design. For this design a score model was formulated which incorporated the criterion of minimal, acceptable performance. Expected values for the mean squares, error and person, were derived and shown to be equal to observed and error variance for C-R tests. C-R reliability was then redefined in terms of the expected values, error and person. Using the methods developed, C-R was calculated for a hypothetical example.

Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 37, No. 1, 21-29 (1977)
DOI: 10.1177/001316447703700103


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Applied Psychological MeasurementHome page
R. E. Traub and G. L. Rowley
Reliability of Test Scores and Decisions
Applied Psychological Measurement, October 1, 1980; 4(4): 517 - 545.
[Abstract]


Home page
Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
H. T. Lovett
The Effect of Violating the Assumption of Equal Item Means in Estimating the Livingston Coefficient
Educational and Psychological Measurement, July 1, 1978; 38(2): 239 - 251.
[Abstract]