Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Educational and Psychological Measurement
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Howard, A.
Right arrow Articles by Carroll, R. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

A Four-Dimensional Sphere? a Paradox in AVA's Vector Model and Profile Analysis Method

Ann Howard

American Telephone and Telegraph Company, New York, N.Y.

Robert M. Carroll

U. S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences

A mathematical analysis is made of the geometric vector model and profile comparison method developed for the Activity Vector Analysis (AVA), a personality measure widely used in industry. The profile comparison formula is shown to be equal to a Pearson r but less parsimonious than the usual formulas. A contradiction is discovered in that the geometric model is presented in three-dimensional space as a sphere or spheroid, whereas the profile comparison formula mathematically requires four-dimensional space to reflect distances between profiles within the sphere. Some recommendations are made regarding resolution of the theoretical incongruency and revision of the measure based on empirical findings.

Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 37, No. 1, 67-79 (1977)
DOI: 10.1177/001316447703700108


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?