Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Educational and Psychological Measurement
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Neely, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Discriminant Analysis for Prediction of College Graduation

Renee Neely

University of Northern Colorado

Data from readily available admission applications were obtained for first-time entering freshmen and transfer students who initially had enrolled at the University of Northern Colorado during the fall quarter 1970. These data were used to predict membership into a class of students who (a) were graduated by the end of the traditional 4-year college career, (b) were still enrolled after the 4-year period, (c) were not enrolled the quarter following academic probation or suspension, or (d) left the university while in good academic standing. This study attempted to answer the following questions: (a) Could discriminant functions be developed which would allow for the correct classification of a student into one of the four categories of interest? (b) Which ones of the variables were the best discriminators between the groups? and (c) How efficient were the discriminant functions in this classification procedure? Results indicated that discriminant functions could be developed which accurately place 33% to 39% of the first-time entering students. The variables which were significant in the prediction differed for female freshmen, male freshmen, male transfers, and female transfers.

Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 37, No. 4, 965-970 (1977)
DOI: 10.1177/001316447703700418


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Adolescent ResearchHome page
M. G. Wintre and M. Yaffe
First-Year Students' Adjustment to University Life as a Function of Relationships with Parents
Journal of Adolescent Research, January 1, 2000; 15(1): 9 - 37.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
D. L. Dagenais
The Use of a Probit Model for the Validation of Selection Procedures
Educational and Psychological Measurement, September 1, 1984; 44(3): 629 - 645.
[Abstract]


Home page
Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
J. A. Breaugh and R. B. Mann
The Utility of Discriminant Analysis for Predicting Graduation From a Master of Business Administration Program
Educational and Psychological Measurement, July 1, 1981; 41(2): 495 - 501.
[Abstract]