Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information on Research and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 3e

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Educational and Psychological Measurement
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Eichenberger, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Creativity Measurement Through Use of Judgment Criteria in Physics

Rudolph J. Eichenberger

Eureka College

The problem of study reported in this paper is the construction and validation of a set of judging criteria for use in evaluating creativity in the physics classroom. An eighteen item judging criterion instrument was developed to assess the relative creativity of paper-and-pencil products produced by thirty-three college general physics students on six assignments. The instrument, called the Judging Criteria Instrument (JCI), was studied for validity by a multiple method of correlating results found from the instrument with results obtained with the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking and with judgments of thirty teachers evaluating products indpendently. The JCI and teacher judgment scores were shown to be reliable through using the split-halves technique. All correlations were calculated in terms of the Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient. The JCI was shown to be valid. The study also indicated that an average of four peer scores employing the JCI does provide a better measurement of creativity than does self-evaluation from using the same instrument.

Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 38, No. 2, 421-427 (1978)
DOI: 10.1177/001316447803800224


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?