Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Educational and Psychological Measurement
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gordon, M. E.
Right arrow Articles by Gross, R. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

A Critique of Methods for Operationalizing the Concept of Fakeability

Michael E. Gordon

University of Tennessee

Ronald H. Gross

General Electric Company

Past practice of operationalizing the concept of fakeability is reviewed. The strengths and weaknesses of these indices (mean difference, percent overlap, percent agreement, correlation, and variance of difference scores) are discussed in the light of a proposed new definition of fakeability based upon Naylor's (1967) model of measurement accuracy.

Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 38, No. 3, 771-782 (1978)
DOI: 10.1177/001316447803800316
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
A. R. Hakstian and E.-L. Ng
Employment-Related Motivational Distortion: Its Nature, Measurement, and Reduction
Educational and Psychological Measurement, June 1, 2005; 65(3): 405 - 441.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
G. J. Lautenschlager
Within-Subject Measures for the Assessment of Individual Differences in Faking
Educational and Psychological Measurement, June 1, 1986; 46(2): 309 - 316.
[Abstract]