Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Educational and Psychological Measurement
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fischer, D. G.
Right arrow Articles by Randhawa, B. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Empirical Validity of Ertl's Brain-Wave Analyzer (BWA02

Donald G. Fischer

University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada

Dennis Hunt

University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada

Bikkar S. Randhawa

University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada

The empirical validity of Ertl's brain wave analyzer was investigated by the known contrasted groups method. Thirty-two academically talented (mean IQ score = 147) and 16 academically handicapped (mean IQ score = 79) boys and girls aged 12-14 years were compared on four Primary Mental Abilities (PMA) tests, two Sequential Tests of Educational Progress (STEP) measures, and seven Brain Wave Analyzer (BWA) measures.

Results indicated that (1) the PMA and STEP variables alone provide excellent discrimination between academically handicapped and academically gifted adolescents; (2) the PMA and STEP variables in combination with BWA variables, (e.g., Frequency Ratio) did afford more accurate discrimination between the two groups than did any one measure alone—a finding suggesting that BWA variables can make a valuable contribution to the understanding of "learning potential"; (3) BWA variables alone did not furnish an adequate level of discrimination between the two groups—an outcome revealing that the BWA cannot be used as a substitute for paper-and-pencil measures of learning potential; (4) the present significant sex differences in BWA scores did imply a need for separate norms for males and females; and (5) the norms set forth in the BWA manual should be revised.

Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 38, No. 4, 1017-1030 (1978)
DOI: 10.1177/001316447803800420
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?