Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Educational and Psychological Measurement
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dailey, D. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

An Analysis and Evaluation of the Internal Validity of the Remote Associates Test: What Does it Measure?

David P. Dailey

University of Wyoming

It is shown that items constructed like those of Mednick's Remote Associates Test (1962) fall into distinct categories. These categories of items are shown to interact significantly with subjects and with subject groups determined on the basis of RAT performance. Furthermore, RAT performance is shown to be more related to performance on items containing idiomatic relationships between stimuli and targets than to performance on items in which such relationships are semantic in nature. It is suggested either that the RAT is measuring a loosely related group of subtraits, or that its item population is poorly specified. Some doubts are cast on the validity of the RAT.

Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 38, No. 4, 1031-1040 (1978)
DOI: 10.1177/001316447803800421


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?