Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Educational and Psychological Measurement
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Smith, P. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

A Confidence Interval Approach for Variance Component Estimates in the Context of Generalizability Theory

Philip L. Smith

University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee

The accuracy of the conclusions drawn from applications of generalizability theory are largely a function of the accuracy of the statistics resulting from a G study analysis. Previous research has shown that errors in variance component estimation due to sampling are often larger than one might suspect. This is particularly true when small samples are used and for complex designs such as multifaceted G studies. For such designs, confidence intervals for variance component estimates could be of great benefit to researchers using G theory. The present study uses Monte Carlo methods to explore the accuracy of a method for establishing confidence intervals for variance component estimates. The results indicate that the technique is only moderately accurate, but if used with caution can guide the researcher as to the accuracy of his/her estimates.

Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 42, No. 2, 459-466 (1982)
DOI: 10.1177/001316448204200209


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Applied Psychological MeasurementHome page
C. W. T. Chiu and E. W. Wolfe
A Method for Analyzing Sparse Data Matrices in the Generalizability Theory Framework
Applied Psychological Measurement, September 1, 2002; 26(3): 321 - 338.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
G. A. Marcoulides
Selecting Weighting Schemes in Multivariate Generalizability Studies
Educational and Psychological Measurement, March 1, 1994; 54(1): 3 - 7.
[Abstract]


Home page
Applied Psychological MeasurementHome page
P. L. Smith and R. M. Luecht
Correlated Effects in Generalizability Studies
Applied Psychological Measurement, September 1, 1992; 16(3): 229 - 235.
[Abstract] [PDF]