Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information on Research and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 3e

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Educational and Psychological Measurement
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Devine, P. J.
Right arrow Articles by Raju, N. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Extent of Overlap among Four Item Bias Methods

Patrick J. Devine

Kennesaw College

Nambury S. Raju

Illinois Institute of Technology

Four methods of item bias detection-transformed item difficulty, item discrimination expressed as Clemans' lambda, ChiSquare, and the three-parameter item characteristic curve-were studied to determine the degree of correspondence among them in identifying biased and unbiased items in reading and math subtests of the 1978 SRA Achievement Series. Intercorrelations among the four methods were moderate at best, confirming previous research involving different item bias analysis techniques. The item discrimination method showed the least correspondence with the other three methods. The extent of overlap between the four item bias methods in identifying biased items depends on the extent of bias in the items comprising the initial pool of items. That is, except for the item discrimination method, the item bias procedures identify similar sets of most biased items.

Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 42, No. 4, 1049-1066 (1982)
DOI: 10.1177/001316448204200412


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Cross-Cultural PsychologyHome page
C. D. Huang, A. T. Church, and M. S. Katigbak
Identifying Cultural Differences in Items and Traits: Differential Item Functioning in the NEO Personality Inventory
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, March 1, 1997; 28(2): 192 - 218.
[Abstract]


Home page
Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
N. S. Raju and J. Normand
The Regression BIAS Method: A Unified Approach for Detecting Item BIAS and Selection BIAS
Educational and Psychological Measurement, March 1, 1985; 45(1): 37 - 54.
[Abstract]