Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for FREE ACCESS to this landmark database

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Educational and Psychological Measurement
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Arlin, P. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

A Multitrait-Multimethod Validity Study of a Test of Formal Reasoning

Patricia Kennedy Arlin

University of British Columbia

A paper-and-pencil test of seven of Inhelder and Piaget's formal operational schemes was developed. This objective assessment of formal operational thought was cross-validated clinically. The multitrait-multimethod procedures indicated that the objective test is a valid and reliable measure of formal operational thought. It has the advantage of being administered in large groups, of being easily scored, and of not requiring special training for its administration.

Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 42, No. 4, 1077-1088 (1982)
DOI: 10.1177/001316448204200414
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 The Journal of School NursingHome page
K. Pohlman, N. Schwab, S. B. Dickey, J. Kiefner, and S. M. Beidler
Consent and Confidentiality Issues Among School-Age Children and Adolescents
The Journal of School Nursing, June 1, 2002; 18(3): 179 - 186.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
W. J. Hagborg and E. M. Wachman
The Arlin Test of Formal Reasoning and the Identification of Accelerated Mathematics Students
Educational and Psychological Measurement, June 1, 1992; 52(2): 437 - 442.
[Abstract]

Home page
 The Journal of Early AdolescenceHome page
G. Belli and T. Gatewood
Readiness for Formal Learning in the Middle Grades: A Study of Predictors for Success in Eighth Grade Algebra
The Journal of Early Adolescence, December 1, 1987; 7(4): 441 - 451.
[Abstract]

Home page
 Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
R. M. Bloland and W. B. Michael
A Comparison of the Relative Validity of a Measure of Piagetian Cognitive Development and a Set of Conventional Prognostic Measures in the Prediction of the Future Success of Ninth- and Tenth-Grade Students in Algebra
Educational and Psychological Measurement, December 1, 1984; 44(4): 925 - 943.
[Abstract]