This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Khattab, A.-M. Articles by Hocevar, D. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The Construct Validity of Higher Order Structure-of-Intellect Abilities in a Battery of Tests Emphasizing the Product of Transformations: A Confirmatory Maximum Likelihood Factor Analysis

University of Southern California

William B. Michael

University of Southern California

Dennis Hocevar

University of Southern California

Within the context of a causal modeling system involving use of Joreskog's confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis in conjunction with the LISREL IV computer program devised by Joreskog and Sorbom an evaluation was made of the construct validity underlying the higher order factor structure of a given correlation matrix of 46 structure-of-intellect (SOI) tests emphasizing the product of transformations. The tenability of four alternative factor models was examined relative to their accounting for the intercorrelations among the 46 tests that had been hypothesized to represent first-order abilities involving one kind of operation, one type of content, and one form of product. The major elements of each of the three postulated dimensions of the SOI model (the five operations, the five contents, and the six products) were defined as the 16 possible third-order factors. The following conclusions resulted: (a) the five third-order SOI factors comprising operations of cognition, convergent production, divergent production, memory, and evaluation do not appear to be highly differentiated (with the cognition and convergent production factors being substantially correlated); (b) the two third-order factors of symbolic and semantic content are relatively discrete; (c) the third-order product factor involving the ability to complete tasks requiring hypothesized transformations is an identifiable construct; and (d) evidence of the construct validity of the third-order factors in the SOI test battery analyzed appears to be at best only equivocal. The predominance of tests intended to reflect the product of transformations (32 out of 46) very possibly created inflated levels of intercorrelations among SOI tests that prevented the emergence of distinct higher order dimensions. New confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analyses of correlational matrices derived from SOI tests in which a careful balance has been achieved in the representation of hypothesized third-order factors across the three basic dimensions of the SOI model are expected to demonstrate differentiability among the higher order constructs.

Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 42, No. 4, 1089-1105 (1982)
DOI: 10.1177/001316448204200415


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				B. Crowder and W. B. Michael The Construct Validity of a Revised Form of a Self-Concept Measure for Employees in a Work Setting Educational and Psychological Measurement, June 1, 1989; 49(2): 421 - 428. [Abstract]

				A.-M. Khattab, D. Hocevar, and W. B. Michael Transformation Abilities: A Reanalysis and Confirmation of SOI Theory Educational and Psychological Measurement, September 1, 1987; 47(3): 597 - 606. [Abstract]

				A.-M. Khattab and W. B. Michael The Construct Validity of Higher Order Structure-of-Intellect Factors Reflecting Semantic and Symbolic Content Abilities Educational and Psychological Measurement, December 1, 1986; 46(4): 1029 - 1035. [Abstract]

				G. H. Roid Construct Validity of the Figural, Symbolic, and Semantic Dimensions of the Structure-of-Intellect Learning Abilities Tests Educational and Psychological Measurement, September 1, 1984; 44(3): 697 - 702. [Abstract]