Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information on Research and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 3e

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Educational and Psychological Measurement
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hopkins, K. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

A Strategy for Analyzing ANOVA Designs Having One or More Random Factors

Kenneth D. Hopkins

Laboratory of Educational Research, University of Colorado

A general analysis strategy is proposed such that the universe of inference is increased incrementally. The strategy prevents logically incongruent findings that occasionally result when the conventional analysis strategy is employed.

Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 43, No. 1, 107-113 (1983)
DOI: 10.1177/001316448304300113
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Eval RevHome page
J. L. Blitstein, P. J. Hannan, D. M. Murray, and W. R. Shadish
Increasing the Degrees of Freedom in Existing Group Randomized Trials: The df* Approach
Eval Rev, June 1, 2005; 29(3): 241 - 267.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Eval RevHome page
H. A. Feldman, S. M. McKinlay, and M. Niknian
Batch Sampling To Improve Power in a Community Trial: Experience From the Pawtucket Heart Health Program
Eval Rev, June 1, 1996; 20(3): 244 - 274.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
D. M. Zucker
An Analysis of Variance Pitfall: The Fixed Effects Analysis in a Nested Design
Educational and Psychological Measurement, December 1, 1990; 50(4): 731 - 738.
[Abstract]

Home page
 Am Educ Res JHome page
M. E. Bleakley, V. Westerberg, and K. D. Hopkins
The Effect of Character Sex on Story Interest and Comprehension in Children
American Educational Research Journal, January 1, 1988; 25(1): 145 - 155.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Am Educ Res JHome page
K. D Hopkins
Generalizability Theory and Experimental Design: Incongruity Between Analysis and Inference
American Educational Research Journal, January 1, 1984; 21(3): 703 - 712.
[Abstract] [PDF]