Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Educational and Psychological Measurement
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by King, D. W.
Right arrow Articles by King, L. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Measurement Precision of the Sex-Role Egalitarianism Scale: A Generalizability Analysis

Daniel W. King

Central Michigan University

Lynda A. King

Central Michigan University

The Sex-Role Egalitarianism (SRE) Scale, recently developed to measure attitudes toward the equality of males and females, consists of two 95-item forms assessing attitudes across five domains of adult life. In this study, a three-facet (items, forms, and testing occasions) random effects generalizability analysis was used to evaluate the precision of each of the domain measures. Ninety-seven male and female psychology students, business students, and senior citizens completed both SRE forms on two separate occasions. Estimates of variance components, generalizability coefficients, and error were computed and examined for indications of measurement precision when generalizing over items, forms, and occasions. Two additional data collection designs are proposed and discussed, with estimates of precision and error presented for varying numbers of levels of the facets of interest.

Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 43, No. 2, 435-447 (1983)
DOI: 10.1177/001316448304300213
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
T. A. Scandura, M. J. Tejeda, and M. J. Lankau
An Examination of the Validity of the Sex-Role Egalitarianism Scale (SRES-KK) Using Confirmatory Factor Analysis Procedures
Educational and Psychological Measurement, October 1, 1995; 55(5): 832 - 840.
[Abstract]