Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Educational and Psychological Measurement
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cooke, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Rousseau, D. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Factor Structure of Level I: Life Styles Inventory

Robert A. Cooke

Department of Management, University of Illinois at Chicago

Denise M. Rousseau

J. L. Kellogg Graduate School of Management, Northwestern University

Level I: Life Styles Inventory is a personal assessment instrument which has been used as a diagnostic tool in various programs for organizational change and individual development. The inventory measures twelve different life styles that are postulated to fall into four general areas of concern: Task/satisfaction; people/satisfaction; task/security; and people/security (Lafferty, 1973). This four-factor model of personal life styles was derived by combining need theory (Maslow, 1954) with personversus task-centered models of leadership (Stogdill, 1963; Blake and Mouton, 1964). In this paper, Level I data from 1000 employees were factor analyzed to empirically test the validity of this four-factor model. Principal components analysis with varimax rotation yielded three factors: People/security; satisfaction; and task/security. While these factors generally are consistent with the underlying dimensions postulated by Lafferty, the second factor (satisfaction) includes both task and people concerns. Additional analyses show these three empirically-derived factors to be differentially related to the salary, organizational level, and managerial specialty of respondents. These results are discussed in terms of the possible effects of organizations on the personal life styles of their members.

Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 43, No. 2, 449-457 (1983)
DOI: 10.1177/001316448304300214


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Group Organization ManagementHome page
R. E. Skenes and C. A. Honig
Pretest/Posttest Use of the Life Styles Inventory for Outcomes Assessment of a Professional Master's in Managerial Leadership Program
Group Organization Management, April 1, 2004; 29(2): 171 - 200.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
W. G. Nediger and P. Chelladurai
Life Styles Inventory: Its Applicability in the Canadian Context
Educational and Psychological Measurement, December 1, 1989; 49(4): 901 - 909.
[Abstract]


Home page
Group Organization ManagementHome page
R. A. Cooke and D. M. Rousseau
Behavioral Norms and Expectations: A Quantitative Approach To the Assessment of Organizational Culture
Group Organization Management, September 1, 1988; 13(3): 245 - 273.
[Abstract]


Home page
Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
R. A. Cooke, D. M. Rousseau, and J. C. Lafferty
Thinking and Behavioral Styles: Consistency between Self-Descriptions and Descriptions by Others
Educational and Psychological Measurement, September 1, 1987; 47(3): 815 - 823.
[Abstract]