Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information on Research and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 3e

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Educational and Psychological Measurement
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Antion, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by Michael, W. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Short-Term Predictive Validity of Demographic, Affective, Personal, and Cognitive Variables in Relation to Two Criterion Measures of Cheating Behaviors

David L. Antion

University of Southern California

William B. Michael

University of Southern California

For a sample of 148 community college students, the short-term predictive validity of each of 18 variables was examined in relation to each of two criterion measures of cheating behavior: (a) incidence (presence or absence) of cheating on an objective final examination in an introductory psychology course and (b) the amount of cheating on this examination. The following conclusions became evident: (1) level of academically related anxiety does exhibit a small but statistically significant correlation with each indicator of cheating, whereas the constructs of locus of control, need for approval, and achievement motivation do not; (2) self-reported grade point average displays an inverse relationship with cheating behavior; (3) each measure of cheating is negatively associated to a moderate degree with the actual score earned on a final examination; and (4) optimally-weighted combinations of selected predictor variables do yield slightly more valid forecasts of cheating behavior than does any one predictor variable alone.

Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 43, No. 2, 467-482 (1983)
DOI: 10.1177/001316448304300216


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Marketing EducationHome page
K. J. Chapman, R. Davis, D. Toy, and L. Wright
Academic Integrity in the Business School Environment: I'll Get by with a Little Help from My Friends
Journal of Marketing Education, December 1, 2004; 26(3): 236 - 249.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Adolescent ResearchHome page
E. D. Evans and D. Craig
Adolescent Cognitions for Academic Cheating as a Function of Grade Level and Achievement Status
Journal of Adolescent Research, July 1, 1990; 5(3): 325 - 345.
[Abstract]