Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Educational and Psychological Measurement
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McCornack, R. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Bias in the Validity of Predicted College Grades in Four Ethnic Minority Groups

Robert L. McCornack

San Diego State University

Measures of high school achievement and scholastic aptitude are often used to predict college freshman grades. Are these predictions biased for members of ethnic minorities? Majority freshmen in a large state university in one year were used to develop a regression equation for predicting first-semester grade point average from high school grade point average and College Board Scholastic Aptitude Test scores. This majority-based equation was used to make predictions in ethnic minority groups of Asian, Hispanic, black, and American Indian students in two successive freshman classes. If unbiased, the predictions would have been (1) at the correct level of achievement in each group, and (2) of equal accuracy in each group. Predictive bias in the form of small but significant over prediction did occur, except among American Indians. Possible bias in predictive accuracy was made difficult to detect because the prediction error variances were moderately high in all ethnic groups in both years. Total error variances were slightly larger in the black and Hispanic minority groups than in the other minority groups, although only a single significant difference was found.

Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 43, No. 2, 517-522 (1983)
DOI: 10.1177/001316448304300220


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hispanic Journal of Behavioral SciencesHome page
N. Rodriguez
Predicting the Academic Success of Mexican American and White College Students
Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, August 1, 1996; 18(3): 329 - 342.
[Abstract]


Home page
REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHHome page
G. J. Cizek
On the Limited Presence of African American Teachers: An Assessment of Research, Synthesis, and Policy Implications
Review of Educational Research, January 1, 1995; 65(1): 78 - 92.
[Abstract] [PDF]