This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Watkins, D. Articles by Astilla, E. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The Validity of the Four Subscales of the Inventory of Learning Processes for a Sample of Filipino Freshman College Students

Australian National University

John Hattie

University of New England, Australia

Estela Astilla

University of San Carlos, Philippines

The college entrance examination scores and first-year college grade point averages of 123 Liberal Arts and Science students at a Filipino university were related to their responses to each of the four subscales of the Inventory of Learning Processes: (a) Deep Processing; (b) Elaborative Processing; (c) Fact Retention; and (d) Methodical Study. The results indicate that the Elaborative Processing subtest was valid in predicting achievement at the college entrance level. The data suggest that the constructs of Elaborative Processing and Deep Processing may become even more closely related to college grades. No evidence was found for the independent influence on achievement of study methods which emphasised either fact retention or a methodical approach.

Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 43, No. 2, 531-536 (1983)
DOI: 10.1177/001316448304300222


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?