Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for FREE ACCESS to this landmark database

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Educational and Psychological Measurement
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Conger, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Dygdon, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

A Generalizability Study of the Conners' Teacher Rating Scale-Revised

Anthony J. Conger

Purdue University

Judith C. Conger

Purdue University

Jan Wallander

Purdue University

David Ward

Purdue University

Judith Dygdon

Purdue University

The hyperactivity scale of the Conners' Teacher Rating Scale-Revised (CTRS-R) was investigated to compare teachers' use of this instrument to its use by independent classroom observers. Results of this study indicate that teacher ratings of children are highly stable over time. Independent observers agree with one another within an occasion both within a classroom and across classrooms; however, observations based on a one-hour period are not stable over time, but a composite score based on three occasions can be expected to be as stable as teacher ratings. Teachers and observers agree only slightly within a classroom, and teacher and observer classroom means are virtually independent of one another. The implications of these results for continued use of teachers' ratings are that the referents for teacher ratings should be determined, ratings should be made more objective, standardization across teachers should be demonstrated before norms are preferred, and the rating scale should be validated via observations or other objective hyperactivity measures.

Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 43, No. 4, 1019-1031 (1983)
DOI: 10.1177/001316448304300410


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Applied Psychological MeasurementHome page
J. E. Bost
The Effects of Correlated Errors on Generalizability and Dependability Coefficients
Applied Psychological Measurement, June 1, 1995; 19(2): 191 - 203.



Home page
Journal of Psychoeducational AssessmentHome page
K. A. Brandon, T. J. Kehle, W. R. Jenson, and E. Clark
Regression, Practice, and Expectation Effects on the Revised Conners Teacher Rating Scale
Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, December 1, 1990; 8(4): 456 - 466.
[Abstract] [PDF]