Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to submit your manuscript to SPPS

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Educational and Psychological Measurement
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Michael, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Michael, W. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Prediction of Academic Achievement in Graduate Study in Education

Joan J. Michael

University of Houston, Clear Lake

Jennifer S. Nadson

University of Southern California

William B. Michael

University of Southern California

From a total group of 653 graduate students who had completed successfully one of several available master's degree programs in a professional school of education at a large state university in a major metropolitan area, various samples and subsamples differentiated by sex were formed depending upon the availability of scores for several standardized aptitude and achievement tests and the presence of undergraduate grades. Correlational analyses of relevant data revealed the following conclusions: (a) the three scales (Verbal, Quantitative, and Total) of the Undergraduate Record Examinations would appear to be more valid than the corresponding scales of the Graduate Record Examinations Aptitude Test as predictors of academic success in the graduate programs leading to the master's degree; (b) undergraduate grades show about equal promise for men and women in forecasting level of achievment in graduate work; (c) standardized achievement and scholastic aptitude test scores afford greater predictive validity for women than for men; and (d) optimally weighted composites of predictor variables can be anticipated to yield validity coefficients significantly higher than those associated with single predictor measures.

Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 43, No. 4, 1133-1139 (1983)
DOI: 10.1177/001316448304300423
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
G. L. Kirchner
Gender as a Moderator Variable in Predicting Success in a Master of Arts in Teaching Program
Educational and Psychological Measurement, March 1, 1993; 53(1): 155 - 157.
[Abstract]