Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Educational and Psychological Measurement
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Conger, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Ward, D. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Agreement among 2 x 2 Agreement Indices

Anthony J. Conger

Purdue University

David G. Ward

Fordham University.

A variety of measures of reliability for two-category nominal scales are reviewed and compared. It is shown that upon correcting these indices for chance agreement, there are only five distinct indices: Fleiss's modification of A1, the {phi} coefficient, Cohen's kappa, and two intraclass coefficients. Additional derivations indicate that when marginals are held constant, all but one of the measures are linear functions of agreement and, thus, of one another. In particular, they are equal once the maximum obtainable values for a given data set are equated. The single exception is an intraclass correlation that explicitly includes variation due to observer mean differences as part of the error variance. This index is dependent on sample size; moreover, as the number of subjects increases, this index approaches the kappa coefficient as a limit. Recommendations for choosing an index of agreement are made based on definitions, magnitude, convenience, and consistency.

Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 44, No. 2, 301-314 (1984)
DOI: 10.1177/0013164484442012


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?