Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Educational and Psychological Measurement
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Michael, W. B.
Right arrow Articles by Michael, J. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Factorial Validity of the Dimensions of Self-Concept (DOSC) Measure for a Sample of Eighth-Grade Children and for One of Community College Adults

William B. Michael

University of Southern California

Im Kyu Kim

University of Southern California

Joan J. Michael

University of Houston, Clear Lake

In this investigation attention was directed toward whether the five hypothesized constructs of Level of Aspiration, Anxiety, Academic Interest and Satisfaction, Leadership and Initiative, and Identification vs. Alienation that have been translated into five subscales of a secondary school version (Form S) of the Dimensions of Self-Concept (DOSC) scale, a measure of academic self-concept, could be identified for a college sample of adults as well as for a sample of eighth-grade students. Factor analyses of the intercorrelations of the same 20 subtests of the DOSC (four subtests of three to four items per factor subscale) revealed a relatively high degree of factorial invariance (congruence) across the two samples. It was concluded that the DOSC measured essentially the same constructs for the two samples and that it showed at least limited promise as a valid indicator of the hypothesized dimensions of academic self-concept for college-level students.

Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 44, No. 2, 413-421 (1984)
DOI: 10.1177/0013164484442022


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
C. Huang and W. B. Michael
A Confirmatory Factor Analysis of Scores on a Chinese Version of an Academic Self-Concept Scale and its Invariance across Groups
Educational and Psychological Measurement, October 1, 2000; 60(5): 772 - 786.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
R. Caracosta and W. B. Michael
The Construct and Concurrent Validity of a Measure of Academic Self-Concept and One of Locus of Control for a Sample of University Students
Educational and Psychological Measurement, September 1, 1986; 46(3): 735 - 744.
[Abstract]


Home page
Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
B. Halote and W. B. Michael
The Construct and Concurrent Validity of Two College-Level Academic Self-Concept Scales for a Sample of Primarily Hispanic Community College Students
Educational and Psychological Measurement, December 1, 1984; 44(4): 993 - 1007.
[Abstract]