Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Educational and Psychological Measurement
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Watkins, E. O.
Right arrow Articles by Wiebe, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Factorial Validity of the Stanford Achievement Test for First-Grade Children

Ernest O. Watkins

Texas Woman's University

Michael J. Wiebe

Texas Woman's University

The factorial validity of the Stanford Achievement Test was investigated with a sample of first grade pupils. Although eight areas are proposed from the SAT, this analysis produced only a single factor. Although the general factor included all eight areas of the SAT, it appeared to be highly influenced by verbal comprehension or reading abilities. In light of these results, interpretation of the SAT for first-grade children should be limited to a total score approach.

Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 44, No. 4, 951-954 (1984)
DOI: 10.1177/0013164484444016
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Hispanic Journal of Behavioral SciencesHome page
E. M. Bernal
Psychometric Inadequacies of the TAAS
Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, November 1, 2000; 22(4): 481 - 507.
[Abstract] [PDF]