Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information on Research and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 3e

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Educational and Psychological Measurement
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shipper, F.
Right arrow Articles by Lewis, K. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

A Study of Four Psychometric Properties of the Jenkins Activity Survey Type a Scale with Suggested Modifications and Validation

Frank Shipper

Department of Management, Arizona State University

Robert Kreitner

Department of Management, Arizona State University

William E. Reif

Department of Management, Arizona State University

Kathryn E. Lewis

Department of Management, California State University-Chico

Despite much evidence that the Jenkins Activity Survey Type A scale is lacking in essential psychometric properties, it continues to be widely used for measuring coronary-prone behavior in both research and applied settings. Four psychometric properties-internal consistency, construct validity, criterion validity, and generalizability-of the JAS Type A scale were assessed relative to coronary risk measurements in a sample of 227 male and female hospital employees. Even when the JAS Type A scale was psychometrically enhanced, it failed to satisfy accepted reliability and validity criteria. Researchers are cautioned against using the JAS Type A scale without performing routine tests of psychometric soundness and controlling for gender differences.

Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 46, No. 3, 551-564 (1986)
DOI: 10.1177/0013164486463008
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?