Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information on Research and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 3e

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Educational and Psychological Measurement
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kingma, J.
Right arrow Articles by Tenvergert, E. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Validation of the Scoring Criterion Problem in Multiplicative Two-Dimensional Classification Tasks

Johannes Kingma

University of Alberta

Elisabeth M. Tenvergert

Department of Sociology, University of Alberta

Three types of scoring for multiplicative two-dimensional classification tasks were distinguished: (1) The non-Genevan judgmentonly scoring criterion, (2) the Genevan scoring criterion of judgment-plus-explanation and (3) and the Genevan scoring criterion of counter suggestion. Two experiments are reported: one cross-sectional study (n = 487 age ranging from 4-year-olds to 11 -year-olds) and one longitudinal study (n=275, age ranging from 4-year-olds to 7-year-olds). The children in the cross-sectional study completed ten multiplicative classification tasks at one test administration, whereas in the longitudinal study the test was administered three times with four months interval. It was shown that all three scoring criteria produced a reliable test for multiplicative classification. Furthermore, the factor structures, which showed a very high degree of similarity for each of the scoring criteria, were invariant in the longitudinal study. It appears that the classification tasks for all these three scoring criteria refer to the same underlying concept. Although these three scoring criteria may be considered satisfactory from a psychometric point of view, one must be aware that the use of one of these criteria in research on the child's ability to understand and to carry out multiplicative classification tasks, needs to be based on an explanatory theoretical framework.

Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 47, No. 2, 385-397 (1987)
DOI: 10.1177/0013164487472011


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?