This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Fischer, D. G. Articles by Donatelli, M. J. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

A Measure of Stress and Arousal: Factor Structure of the Stress Adjective Checklist

University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada

Martin J. Donatelli

University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada

A 20-item Stress Adjective Checklist (MacKay et al., 1978) was administered to 565 Canadian undergraduate psychology students and factor analyzed. A 4-factor solution was discarded as it could not be replicated. Both the 3-factor and 2-factor solutions were replicable and interpretable. The 3-factor solution comprised one bipolar and two correlated, monopolar factors, whereas the 2-factor solution contained two uncorrelated, bipolar factors. The 2-factor solution (stress and arousal) was chosen because it was felt that two factors better represented the affect domain and that the 3-factor solution (containing monopolar factors) may be an artifact of the methodology, that is, response scale asymmetry, scale imbalance and social desirability. The 2-factor solution was very similar to that found in British and Australian samples (King et al., 1983; MacKay et al., 1978) and supports the view of Russell (1979, 1980) that affect space is bipolar. Results are contrary to the view of Nowlis (1965) and Thayer (1967) and others, who argue in favor of monopolar factors. Suggestions for further research and refinement of the scale are made.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?