Educational and Psychological Measurement

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Glutting, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Stanley, J. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 47, No. 3, 607-614 (1987)
DOI: 10.1177/001316448704700307
© 1987 SAGE Publications

Resolving Differences among Methods of Establishing Confidence Limits for Test Scores

Joseph J. Glutting

University of Delaware

Paul A. Mcdermott

University of Pennsylvania

Julian C. Stanley

Johns Hopkins University

Microcomputer scoring and interpretation systems are making it easier for psychologists to report confider -e limits for test scores. This paper focuses on the basic theory underlying confidence limits and presents reasons why psychologists should incorporate confidence ranges in their narrative reports. The paper also compares four methods for establishing confidence limits. In particular, the standard error of measurement procedure is compared to three lesser-known procedures that establish limits around an estimated true score. Equations are presented for calculating confidence limits, and recommendations are made for the appropriate application of such limits during psychodiagnostic evaluations.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Psychoeducational AssessmentHome page
S. L. Bliss
Test Reviews: Newborg, J. (2005). Battelle Developmental Inventory Second Edition. Itasca, IL: Riverside
Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, December 1, 2007; 25(4): 409 - 415.
[PDF]


Home page
Journal of Psychoeducational AssessmentHome page
R. A. Charter and L. S. Feldt
Confidence Intervals for True Scores: Is There a Correct Approach?
Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, December 1, 2001; 19(4): 350 - 364.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Psychoeducational AssessmentHome page
R. A. Charter and L. S. Feldt
The Relationship between Two Methods of Evaluating an Examinee's Difference Scores
Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, June 1, 2000; 18(2): 125 - 142.
[Abstract] [PDF]