Educational and Psychological Measurement

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Register here to gain access to SAGE's 500+ Journals Online

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kennedy, J. K.
Right arrow Articles by Gallo, D. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 47, No. 3, 807-814 (1987)
DOI: 10.1177/001316448704700335

Construct Space of the Least Preferred Co-Worker (LPC) Scale

John K. Kennedy, Jr.

New York University

John M. Houston

New York University

M. Audrey Korsgaard

New York University

Donald D. Gallo

New York University

An attempt was made to determine the meaning of the least preferred co-worker (LPC) score by means of a confirmatory analysis. The LPC score is considered to be a measure of leader-ship style which distinguishes people motivated primarily by task accomplishment from those motivated by successful interpersonal relations. One hundred and sixty-three subjects completed a test battery containing eight measures which were expected to be related to LPC and 10 measures which were not. The results of the analyses indicated that LPC and two of its component subscores occupy a construct space independent of all the other measures. These findings have negative implications for Fiedler's contingency model since they cast doubt upon the validity of LPC, the model's central construct, as a measure of leadership style.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Management Communication QuarterlyHome page
J. K. Barge and D. W. Schlueter
Leadership as Organizing: A Critique of Leadership Instruments
Management Communication Quarterly, May 1, 1991; 4(4): 541 - 570.
[Abstract]