Educational and Psychological Measurement

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Free Access - Register Here

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cooke, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Lafferty, J. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 47, No. 3, 815-823 (1987)
DOI: 10.1177/001316448704700336

Thinking and Behavioral Styles: Consistency between Self-Descriptions and Descriptions by Others

Robert A. Cooke

University of Illinois at Chicago

Denise M. Rousseau

Northwestern University

J. Clayton Lafferty

Human Synergistics

Managers participating in management development programs provided self-report data on their thinking and behavioral styles as measured by Level I: Life Styles Inventory. Five co-workers (superiors, subordinates, peers) also described each manager on a parailel form of the inventory, Level II: Description by Others. These data were used to assess the consensual validity (agreement between self and others) and inter-rater reliability (agreement among others) of the twelve thinking/behavioral style measures included in the inventory. The results indicated that there was a fair amount of agreement among the respondents describing each manager, with eta-squared statistics ranging from 0.33 to 0.47 for the twelve styles. Correlations between self-reports and descriptions by others along the twelve measures ranged from .16 to .32. While these results provide some support for the consensual validity of the measures, they also point out important differences between the way managers see themselves and how they are perceived by others. It is concluded that feedback from others can observable of the twelve styles measured.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Group Organization ManagementHome page
R. E. Skenes and C. A. Honig
Pretest/Posttest Use of the Life Styles Inventory for Outcomes Assessment of a Professional Master's in Managerial Leadership Program
Group Organization Management, April 1, 2004; 29(2): 171 - 200.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
W. G. Nediger and P. Chelladurai
Life Styles Inventory: Its Applicability in the Canadian Context
Educational and Psychological Measurement, December 1, 1989; 49(4): 901 - 909.
[Abstract]


Home page
Group Organization ManagementHome page
R. A. Cooke and D. M. Rousseau
Behavioral Norms and Expectations: A Quantitative Approach To the Assessment of Organizational Culture
Group Organization Management, September 1, 1988; 13(3): 245 - 273.
[Abstract]