Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for FREE ACCESS to this landmark database

Click here for more information on Research and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 3e

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Educational and Psychological Measurement
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Silverman, S.
Right arrow Articles by Zotos, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Validity of Interval and Time Sampling Methods for Measuring Student Engaged Time in Physical Education

Stephen Silverman

Department of Physical and Health Education, The University of Texas at Austin

Connee Zotos

Department of Physical and Health Education, The University of Texas at Austin

The purpose of this study was to investigate whether interval and time sampling methods of measuring student engaged time are valid for estimating the actual time students spend engaged in relevant motor performance in physical education classes. Two versions of the interval Academic Learning Time in Physical Education (ALT-PE) instrument and an equivalent time sampling method were compared with actual time students spent in motor performance. Thirty-six students enrolled in six different university physical education classes were the subjects. The actual student engaged time and engaged time as estimated by the time sampling instrument were significantly lower than the time as estimated with the two ALT-PE instruments. In addition, a class type by coding instrument interaction occurred indicating that the difference was present for all classes except where activity is continuous. This result suggests that the popularity of the ALT-PE instruments should be reexamined.

Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 47, No. 4, 1005-1012 (1987)
DOI: 10.1177/0013164487474016


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?