Educational and Psychological Measurement

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Register here to gain access to SAGE's 500+ Journals Online

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dunlap, W. P.
Right arrow Articles by Phelps, G. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 47, No. 4, 917-923 (1987)
DOI: 10.1177/0013164487474007

A Monte Carlo Study of Using the First Eigenvalue for Averaging Intercorrelations

William P. Dunlap

Tulane University

N. Clayton Silver

Tulane University

Glenn R. Phelps

Tulane University

A procedure proposed by Kaiser (1968) for averaging correlation coefficients using the first eigenvalue of an intercorrelation matrix was studied via Monte Carlo methods. The Kaiser average if applied to sample intercorrelations was found to be markedly biased toward overestimation of the population correlation when the population correlation was small, and to show a slight negative bias similar to average r when the population correlation was large. A modification of the Kaiser average substantially reduced the bias for correlations near zero and showed slightly smaller standard errors (greater efficiency) than the other averages for small correlations. The least biased averaging procedure still appears to be the backtransformed average Fisher's z, particularly when sample size is small.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
L. S. Feldt and R. A. Charter
Averaging Internal Consistency Reliability Coefficients
Educational and Psychological Measurement, April 1, 2006; 66(2): 215 - 227.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL AND BEHAVIORAL STATISTICSHome page
I.-B. Lian and W.-C. Young
On the Measurement of Concordance Among Variables and Its Application
Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, January 1, 2001; 26(4): 431 - 442.
[Abstract] [PDF]