This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Fleishman, J. Articles by Benson, J. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Using Lisrel to Evaluate Measurement Models and Scale Reliability

University of Maryland

Jeri Benson

University of Maryland

The present paper demonstrates how LISREL can be used to examine measurement model assumptions and to assess the reliability of a scale. LISREL was used to investigate (a) the nature of the basic measurement model for a scale, (b) scale invariance across time, and (c) scale invariance across groups. Information obtained in such analyses helps to assess accurately the estimate of the reliability of the scale. As an illustration, responses of 722 elementary school students to the Coopersmith Self-Esteem Inventory (Form B) were analyzed. Results indicated that a congeneric measurement model with correlated errors was most appropriate. Internal-consistency estimates were not affected by correlated errors, within each of the two time points (pretest and posttest). However, correlated errors across time produced an overestimate of the stability coefficient. Further, the factor structure of the scale was invariant across three ethnic groups, an invariance that implied similar reliability estimates across groups.

Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 47, No. 4, 925-939 (1987)
DOI: 10.1177/0013164487474008


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. R. Critchley Public opinion and trust in scientists: the role of the research context, and the perceived motivation of stem cell researchers Public Understanding of Science, July 1, 2008; 17(3): 309 - 327. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Dowson and D. M. McInerney The Development and Validation of the Goal Orientation and Learning Strategies Survey (Goals-S) Educational and Psychological Measurement, April 1, 2004; 64(2): 290 - 310. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Gray and H. Laidlaw Improving the Measurement of Communication Satisfaction Management Communication Quarterly, February 1, 2004; 17(3): 425 - 448. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. Yang Identifying Valid and Reliable Measures for Dimensions of a Learning Culture Advances in Developing Human Resources, May 1, 2003; 5(2): 152 - 162. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Blunt and B. Yang Factor Structure of the Adult Attitudes Toward Adult and Continuing Education Scale and its Capacityt O Predict Participation Behavior: Evidence for Adoption of a Revised Scale Adult Education Quarterly, August 1, 2002; 52(4): 299 - 314. [PDF]

				L. Steed Further Validity and Reliability Evidence for Beck Hopelessness Scale Scores in a Nonclinical Sample Educational and Psychological Measurement, April 1, 2001; 61(2): 303 - 316. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. Schoonen, M. Vergeer, and M. Eiting The assessment of writing ability: expert readers versus lay readers Language Testing, July 1, 1997; 14(2): 157 - 184. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S.-E. Reuterberg and J.-E. Gustafsson Confirmatory Factor Analysis and Reliability: Testing Measurement Model Assumptions Educational and Psychological Measurement, December 1, 1992; 52(4): 795 - 811. [Abstract]

				M. H. Eiting Sequential Reliability Tests Applied Psychological Measurement, June 1, 1991; 15(2): 193 - 205. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. L. Brown Using Covariance Modeling for Estimating Reliability on Scales with Ordered Polytomous Variables Educational and Psychological Measurement, June 1, 1989; 49(2): 385 - 398. [Abstract]