Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Educational and Psychological Measurement
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cooke, R. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Assessing Managerial Skills with the "Management Effectiveness Profile System"

Robert A. Cooke

University of Illinois at Chicago

The Management Effectiveness Profile System (MEPS) provides managers with feedback on fifteen different task skills (e.g., decision making, planning), people skills (e.g., managing conflict, developing subordinates), and personal factors (e.g., time management, commitment level) hypothesized to be related to their overall job performance. Self-descriptions are profiled against descriptions by others along the 90 items comprising the instrument as well as the fifteen categories. Data on 404 managers who recently received such feedback were used to assess the reliability and validity of the Profile System. The results indicate that the internal consistency reliability of the scales is fairly high, though many of the items correlate with other scales almost as strongly as they do with their own. Inter-rater agreement among the other people describing each manager is acceptable and, for many scales, is greater than the agreement between the others' and the managers' own reports. The criterion-related validity of the instrument is supported by a small but significant relation between the task skills and personal factors and an independent measure of the managers' effectiveness. It is concluded that the instrument is useful for identifying relevant areas for self-development, but that managers should focus on item-level as well as scale results and should be sensitive to discrepancies between their self reports and the descriptions by others.

Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 49, No. 3, 723-732 (1989)
DOI: 10.1177/001316448904900327


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?