|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Development and Validation of the Computer Self-Efficacy Scale
Christine A. Murphy
University of Connecticut
Delphine Coover
University of Connecticut
Steven V. Owen
University of Connecticut
A 32-item Computer Self-Efficacy Scale (CSE) was developed to measure perceptions of capability regarding specific computer-related knowledge and skills. Data from 414 individuals engaged in learning to use computers in three settings were used to conduct analyses for assessing the reliability and construct validity of the instrument. A principal factor analysis with oblique rotation produced a conceptually meaningful 3-factor solution with high alpha reliabilities. An additional analysis suggested that the males and females in this study differed in judgments of their computer capability.
Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 49, No. 4,
893-899 (1989)
DOI: 10.1177/001316448904900412

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. C. Moos and R. Azevedo
Learning With Computer-Based Learning Environments: A Literature Review of Computer Self-Efficacy
Review of Educational Research,
June 1, 2009;
79(2):
576 - 600.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. J. Mallen, D. L. Vogel, A. B. Rochlen, and S. X Day
Online Counseling: Reviewing the Literature From a Counseling Psychology Framework
The Counseling Psychologist,
November 1, 2005;
33(6):
819 - 871.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Torkzadeh and X. Koufteros
Factorial Validity of a Computer Self-Efficacy Scale and the Impact of Computer Training
Educational and Psychological Measurement,
September 1, 1994;
54(3):
813 - 821.
[Abstract]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. W. Harrison and R. K. Rainer JR.
An Examination of the Factor Structures and Concurrent Validities for the Computer Attitude Scale, the Computer Anxiety Rating Scale, and the Computer Self-Efficacy Scale
Educational and Psychological Measurement,
September 1, 1992;
52(3):
735 - 745.
[Abstract]
|
 |
|
|
|