Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Educational and Psychological Measurement
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Swartz, C. W.
Right arrow Articles by Patterson, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Factorial Structure of the North Carolina Teaching Performance Appraisal Instrument

Carl W. Swartz

School of Education, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Kinnard P. White

School of Education, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Gary B. Stuck

School of Education, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Toni Patterson

Wake County Schools, Raleigh, NC

The factorial structure of the performance ratings of 27 teaching practices contained on the North Carolina Teaching Performance Appraisal Instrument (TPAI) is reported in this paper. As currently used, ratings using the TPAI yield five scores: (a) Management of Instructional Time, (b) Management of Student Behavior, (c) Instructional Presentation, (d) Instructional Monitoring, and (e) Instructional Feedback. This five function scoring scheme is based on logical judgement and not empirical evidence. The results a study using factor analysis procedures suggest that a five factor solution that paralleled the current scoring scheme was not as parsimonious as a two factor solution. The clarity and meaningfulness of the interpretation of the two factor solution provides supportive evidence for the construct validity of the TPAI as well as suggestions for a more utilitarian procedure for using the instrument in large scale teaching performance assessment programs.

Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 50, No. 1, 175-182 (1990)
DOI: 10.1177/0013164490501021
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?