Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to submit your manuscript to SPPS

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Educational and Psychological Measurement
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cahan, S.
Right arrow Articles by Cohen, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Self-Correction of Wrong Answers as an Alternative to the Arbitrary Setting of Observed-Score Standards in Competency Testing

Sorel Cahan

The Hebrew University of Jerusalem

Nora Cohen

The Hebrew University of Jerusalem

The probabilities of the two types of classification errors in competency testing are not equally manipulable. Whereas testers can successfully minimize the probability of Type II error (misidentification of true "nonmasters" as "masters"), they are much less able to do so relative to Type I error (misidentification of true "masters" as "nonmasters"). Consequently, the proportion of identified nonmasters is likely to be artifactually high. The currently used method for coping with this problem is the arbitrary setting of observed-score standards below 100%. This paper offers an alternative solution which does not involve arbitrary decisions -namely, self-correction of wrong answers. The paper presents the rationale underlying this solution and discusses its application.

Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 50, No. 1, 7-13 (1990)
DOI: 10.1177/0013164490501002


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?