Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Educational and Psychological Measurement
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by LeGagnoux, G.
Right arrow Articles by Maxwell, V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Retest Effects on Standardized Structure-of-Intellect Ability Measures for a Sample of Elementary School Children

Gerald LeGagnoux

University of California, Los Angeles

William B. Michael

University of Southern California

Dennis Hocevar

University of Southern California

Valarie Maxwell

Science Institute, El Segundo, California

Within the context of a battery of 26 multifactor aptitude tests entitled the Structure of Intellect Learning Abilities Test and developed from the structure-of-intellect conceptual framework, the major purpose of this study was to examine for a sample of more than 2,000 elementary school children the nature and degree of relationship of retest effects from a first testing (pretest) to a second testing (posttest) two to four weeks later to (a) grade level (age), (b) gender, (c) general ability level, and (d) use of an identical or parallel form on the posttest in relation to the pretest. The gain scores in standard score form on the 26 SOI-LA subtests constituted the 26 dependent variables.

A four-way univariate analysis of variance (ANOVA) on unique effects (i.e., a simultaneous solution) was conducted. Results suggested the following conclusions. Younger children tended to show greater mean gain scores than older children. Gender appears to be unrelated to score changes upon retesting. Greater mean gain scores were evident for low ability children than for high ability children. Greater score gains may be expected on ability measures when the posttest is the same test form as the pretest than when the posttest is a parallel test form.

Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 50, No. 3, 475-492 (1990)
DOI: 10.1177/0013164490503002


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?