Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Educational and Psychological Measurement
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Watters, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Streiner, D. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Factor Analysis of the Nowicki-Strickland Locus of Control Scale: Why is Replication So Difficult?

Derek A. Watters

Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University

B. Helen Thomas

School of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University

David L. Streiner

Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University

This study represented an attempt to replicate the factor structure obtained by Lindal and Venables (1983) for the Nowicki-Strickland Locus of Control Scale (NSLCS) for Children. Although the same factor analytic techniques were used on a similarly-constituted sample, a somewhat different solution was obtained. Comrey (1973) suggested that scales with dichotomous items cannot be factor analyzed reliably. As a more rigorous test of this theory, the factor analyses performed on two randomly-selected samples from one study were compared. However, this replication attempt also failed. The authors concluded that the dichotomous nature of the NSLCS Scale is the reason that replication of its factor structure has been so elusive.

Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 50, No. 3, 515-523 (1990)
DOI: 10.1177/0013164490503005
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
J. M. Kishton and K. F. Widaman
Unidimensional Versus Domain Representative Parceling of Questionnaire Items: An Empirical Example
Educational and Psychological Measurement, September 1, 1994; 54(3): 757 - 765.
[Abstract]