Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information on Research and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 3e

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Educational and Psychological Measurement
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Maurer, T. J.
Right arrow Articles by Stevens, S. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Self-Ratings in Attitude Measurement: Resistance to Short-Term Recalibration and Contrast

Todd J. Maurer

Georgia Institute of Technology

Ralph A. Alexander

The University of Akron

Sean E. Stevens

The University of Akron

An extension has been made of past research on the theory of "psychological perspective" (Ostrom and Upshaw, 1968) that emphasizes the concept of rating scale calibration in attitude measurement. Perspective theory may hold implications for attitude surveys in that differences in attitude across groups or individuals may be diluted, exaggerated, or real depending on differences in perspective when completing self-ratings of attitude on a graphic scale. A second implication, however, is that scales may become recalibrated transiently, as in the classic contrast effect. A conservative test of this second implication of the model was provided to investigate whether the use of simple graphic rating scales in attitude measurement may be complicated by this type of transient scale shift. Hypothesized initial shifts and their temporal decay were investigated. However, the data did not support the short term recalibration effect. Overall, the data supplemented past research that supports the use of graphic rating scales as valid and reliable measures of attitude. It is also suggested that in some situations, a single graphic rating may be effectively substituted for longer and more sophisticated scaling techniques.

Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 50, No. 3, 525-538 (1990)
DOI: 10.1177/0013164490503006
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?