Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Educational and Psychological Measurement
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Glaub, V. E.
Right arrow Articles by Kamphaus, R. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Construction of a Nonverbal Adaptation of the Stanford-Binet Fourth Edition

Vincent E. Glaub

University of Georgia

Randy W. Kamphaus

University of Georgia

The purpose of this investigation was to construct a nonverbal short form of the Stanford-Binet Fourth Edition (Binet 4) for use in the evaluation of hearing impaired, speech/language disabled, and limited English proficient children. Subtests were selected based on ratings of Binet 4 users. The subtests selected included Bead Memory, Pattern Analysis, Copying, Memory for Objects, and Matrices. The reliability coefficient for this new composite score was .95, and the validity of this composite, as estimated by its correlation with the test composite from the full battery, was .91. A procedure for generating estimated composites based on the Binet Nonverbal Scale is provided with a rationale for its use in clinical assessment practice.

Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 51, No. 1, 231-241 (1991)
DOI: 10.1177/0013164491511023
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Journal of Psychoeducational AssessmentHome page
M. A. Volker, V. Guarnaccia, and J. R. Scardapane
Short Forms of the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale: Fourth Edition for Screening Potentially Gifted Preschoolers
Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, September 1, 1999; 17(3): 226 - 235.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Journal of Psychoeducational AssessmentHome page
C. A. Riccio, C. M. Ross, C. H. Boan, S. Jemison, and F. Houston
Use of the Differential Ability Scales (DAS) Special Nonverbal Composite among Young Children with Linguistic Differences
Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, September 1, 1997; 15(3): 196 - 204.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Journal of Psychoeducational AssessmentHome page
T. W. Powell and M. J. Germani
Linguistic, Intellectual, and Adaptive Behavior Skills in a Sample of Children with Communication Disorders
Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, June 1, 1993; 11(2): 158 - 172.
[Abstract] [PDF]