Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Educational and Psychological Measurement
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hyman, G. J.
Right arrow Articles by Burrows, G. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Relationship between Three Multidimensional Locus of Control Scales

Graeme J. Hyman

Department of Applied Psychology, Monash University

Robb Stanley

Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne

Graham D. Burrows

Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne

A number of different multi-dimensional scales have been developed to measure the locus of control construct. This study examined three of these scales, Levenson's Locus of Control Scale (LOC), based on Social Learning theory, the Trent Attributional Profile (TAP) and Multidimensional-Multiattributional Causality Scales (MMCS) both based on the attributional perspective. A total of 161 undergraduate students with a mean age of 23.1 (SD = 8.19) provided responses to each of the three scales. Results revealed a number of psychometric problems with both the TAP and MMCS, along with small but statistically significant correlations between the equivalent subscales on both inventories. Overall, the LOC achieved statistically significant correlations with both the TAP and MMCS suggesting that although the scales were developed from different theoretical perspectives, they appear to measure similar constructs.

Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 51, No. 2, 403-412 (1991)
DOI: 10.1177/0013164491512014


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?