Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Educational and Psychological Measurement
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Carraher, S. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

A Validity Study of the Pay Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSQ)

Shawn M. Carraher

The University of Oklahoma

The dimensionality of the Pay Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSQ) was examined using a principal components analysis with an oblique rotation and the parallel analysis criterion was used to determine the number of components to retain. It was found that the items which were supposed to load on the Raise scale instead loaded on the level and structure/administration components and that in fact a raise component did not exist. It was recommended that in the future researchers use more accurate methods to determine the number of components to retain and that they do not assume that the dimensions of compensation satisfaction are orthogonal.

Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 51, No. 2, 491-495 (1991)
DOI: 10.1177/0013164491512024
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
S. De Gieter, J. Hofmans, R. De Cooman, and R. Pepermans
Measurement Invariance of the Pay Satisfaction Questionnaire Across Gender: Explaining the ''Contented Female Worker Paradox'' More Thoroughly
Educational and Psychological Measurement, October 1, 2009; 69(5): 843 - 854.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
F. Lievens, F. Anseel, M. M. Harris, and J. Eisenberg
Measurement Invariance of the Pay Satisfaction Questionnaire Across Three Countries
Educational and Psychological Measurement, December 1, 2007; 67(6): 1042 - 1051.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Journal of ManagementHome page
M. L. Williams, S. B. Malos, and D. K. Palmer
Benefit System and Benefit Level Satisfaction: An Expanded Model of Antecedents and Consequences
Journal of Management, April 1, 2002; 28(2): 195 - 215.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
N. E. Turner
The Effect of Common Variance and Structure Pattern on Random Data Eigenvalues: Implications for the Accuracy of Parallel Analysis
Educational and Psychological Measurement, August 1, 1998; 58(4): 541 - 568.
[Abstract]

Home page
 Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
D. E. Hart and S. M. Carraher
The Development of an Instrument to Measure Attitudes toward Benefits
Educational and Psychological Measurement, June 1, 1995; 55(3): 480 - 484.
[Abstract]