Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Educational and Psychological Measurement
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Emmer, E. T.
Right arrow Articles by Hickman, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Teacher Efficacy in Classroom Management and Discipline

Edmund T. Emmer

University of Texas at Austin

Julia Hickman

University of Texas at Austin

A scale for measuring teacher efficacy in classroom management and discipline is presented, along with results from a factor analysis of intercorrelations of items from the scale and items from two other teacher efficacy scales. Data sources included 119 preservice teacher education students and 42 student teachers. Results are presented indicating that classroom management/discipline efficacy is distinct from other types of teacher efficacy, and that the subscales have acceptable internal consistency and test-retest reliability. The data also indicate that efficacy beliefs predict preferences for certain strategies to deal with problems presented in vignettes; however, no relationships were found between self efficacy scores of student teachers and ratings of teaching performance made by university supervisors.

Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 51, No. 3, 755-765 (1991)
DOI: 10.1177/0013164491513027


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
School Psychology InternationalHome page
W. J. G. Evers, W. Tomic, and A. Brouwers
Burnout among Teachers: Students' and Teachers' Perceptions Compared
School Psychology International, May 1, 2004; 25(2): 131 - 148.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Emotional and Behavioral DisordersHome page
J. E. Gonzalez, J. R. Nelson, T. B. Gutkin, and C. S. Shwery
Teacher Resistance to School-Based Consultation with School Psychologists: A Survey of Teacher Perceptions
Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, January 1, 2004; 12(1): 30 - 37.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Teacher Education and Special Education: The Journal of the Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional ChildrenHome page
Y. Leyser
Choices of Instructional Practices and Efficacy Beliefs of Israeli General and Special Educators: A Cross-Cultural Research Initiative
Teacher Education and Special Education: The Journal of the Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional Children, April 1, 2002; 25(2): 154 - 167.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
A. Brouwers and W. Tomic
The Factorial Validity of Scores on the Teacher Interpersonal Self-Efficacy Scale
Educational and Psychological Measurement, June 1, 2001; 61(3): 433 - 445.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
Y. Rich, S. Lev, and S. Fischer
Extending the Concept and Assessment of Teacher Efficacy
Educational and Psychological Measurement, December 1, 1996; 56(6): 1015 - 1025.
[Abstract]