Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Educational and Psychological Measurement
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Woehr, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Fehrmann, M. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

An Empirical Comparison of Cutoff Score Methods for Content-Related and Criterion-Related Validity Settings

David J. Woehr

Texas A&M University

Winfred Arthur, Jr.

Texas A&M University

Melinda L. Fehrmann

Texas A&M University

The objective of this paper was to comparatively evaluate different methods for obtaining cutoff scores in content and criterion-related validity settings. Cutoff score methods were compared in reference to the predictor standard error of measurement, number of correct and incorrect classification decisions obtained with each cutoff score procedure, and overall actual criterion performance of individuals passing each cutoff score. Results indicate that while the various methods do result in slightly different cutoff score values, they all fell within the standard error of measurement. In addition, although differences in cutoff values were reflected in differences in the number of correct and incorrect decisions, differences in the actual criterion performance of individuals passing each cutoff score were minimal. The results are discussed in terms of their implications for applied decision making especially in situations where criterion data are unavailable and the use of tests is based on content-related validity evidence.

Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 51, No. 4, 1029-1039 (1991)
DOI: 10.1177/001316449105100423
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
G. M. Hurtz and M. A. Auerbach
A Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Modifications to the Angoff Method on Cutoff Scores and Judgment Consensus
Educational and Psychological Measurement, August 1, 2003; 63(4): 584 - 601.
[Abstract] [PDF]